Indicator Assessment
Within the last years intensive efforts have been made in order to balance the need for an efficient air transport system and the negative effects of growing air transport with regard to sustainability issues. Especially in the field of environment the pressure to decouple growing demand and economic benefits from a higher emissions development path and noise exposure is immense. Thus, expected demand for air services may collide with the need for a sustainable air transport system.
Addressing this problem, an evaluation of the air transport development regarding a general sustainable development is needed to achieve orientation for further improvements in the air transport sector. On this basis the detailed MONITOR indicator system was developed, which deals with the long-term global air transport development from a long-term time horizon of more than two decades. It considers an economic, ecological and social perspective and is capable of a continuous analysis of main trends with regard to the three pillars of sustainability. The complete set of these single indicators can be found here.
Besides the consideration of these separate indicators, a first assessment of the status quo of the past and current sustainability degree of the air transport system has been undertaken by a comparative analysis of selected indicators. These were chosen according to their ability for providing a primary impression of the general development of the air transport system. Thus, they allowed putting concrete observations into relation to existing sustainability and strategic goals from politics and industry in a later step.

The chosen indicators for the indicator assessment deal with different components of the air transport system or, in concrete, with system internal and external components. The group of Performance Indicators (PIs), which cover the air transport system internal point of view, is exemplary described by the specific fuel consumption and productivity. The Sustainable Development Indicators (SDIs) are represented by the indicators of mobility, the degree of safety (development of accidents) and emissions that reflect air transport developments with a superior meaning for the overall sustainability. The chosen indicator examples therefore allow a short but comprehensive evaluation of air transport trends. As far as data was available, the indicators show the period from 1990 to 2011 to present a long-term view which enables the recognition of clear trends. With regard to a better comparison they were indexed in reference to the year 1990 and merged in the figure above.
- Productivity
- Fuel Consumption
- CO2 Emissions
- Accidents
- Mobility
Background on Strategic and Sustainable Development Goals
In a second step after the overall indicator assessment, concrete sustainability and strategic goals from the field of politics and industry can be reviewed for evaluating the observed trends with regard to their concrete impacts. Efficient priority and goal setting in relation to a deepened understanding of air transport developments and drivers can contribute in this context to solve the conflicts of air transport and its potential negative impacts. Following this approach, the understanding and assessment of overall global air transport trends in relation to existing (sustainable) development goals may serve as a first step and orientation for all involved actors. Furthermore, gaps between reality and preferred development paths can be identified which allow the deviation of suggestions for the strengthening of sustainability in the aviation industry and for improvements of the existing development and sustainability goals for the air transport sector.
Addressing this intention, the following table summarises all sustainability goals which were investigated in the context of this approach.
Overview on Sustainable Development Goals
UN (2012): Sustainable development goals from the UN resolution A/RES/66/288 | World Business Council for Sustainable Development (2010): Vision 2050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An analysis of the existing sustainable development goals from the field of politics shows that only a minority of actors have set up clear and aggregated sustainable development goals. Often these goals are focused on the transport sector in general, whereas concrete specifications for the aviation sector are even harder to find. The main guideline for the further analysis of the air transport development in the light of sustainability in the context of the MONITOR project was therefore primarily derived from the final resolution of the Rio+20 conference (UN 2012), as it includes at least two sections about sustainable transport and highlights the special function of transport to strengthen the overall economic development and to provide mobility opportunities. Another source for sustainable development goals has a minor coverage than the UN publication but the "Vision 2050", published by the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD 2010), lists at least two goals for the global air transport development.
Due to the small range of existing sustainable development goals for the air transport sector, some strategic priorities from air transport institutions and the air transport industry were also considered in the following analysis. They are summarised in the following table.
Overview on Strategic Development Goals
ICAO (2011): Strategic Objectives 2011-2013 | IATA (2012): Priorities and Targets | ACARE (2012): Flightpath 2050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
The strategic development goals have a narrower focus than the sustainable development goals although they can be influenced by the last mentioned ones. They were mainly defined by industry associations or political bodies and organisations for the aviation sector without addressing the development postulates with regard to other sectors. Partly, they consist also rather of short-term objectives than of long-term ones. Additionally, framework developments which can influence the air transport sector's future perspectives are also only partly considered by these actors. Therefore, they have to be interpreted more carefully. However, strategic development goals play a notable role in designing an efficient air transport system in itself and in order to bring aviation in the right position to contribute to an overall sustainable development in the future.
According to the important functions and definitions of PIs and SDIs, suitable goals and development priorities of three important actors are shown in the table above. ICAO as United Nations specialised agency and global organisation with legitimation to set up international standards for civil aviation is the first one. IATA as the world's leading association of global airlines is a second important actor and publishes also regularly priorities and goals which are representative for its members. The Advisory Council for Aviation Research and Innovation in Europe (ACARE), a group of key stakeholders from the European aviation industry and research, which works on behalf of the European Union, finally completes this set. Although they come from a European perspective, their vision for aviation up to 2050 is relevant for the whole sector as air transport is a global business and ACARE considers global trends as well (ACARE, 2012).
Development tendencies
In the following the above selected indicators and their development are related to the sustainable and strategic development goals in order to evolve an assessment tool for the evaluation of the long-term development of the global air transport system. For this purpose, which was one main objective within the MONITOR project, each of the five sustainable and strategic development goals sets will be compared to the selected five indicators. The symbols under each matrix provide further information on the concrete assessment in this context.
- UN
- WBCSD
- ICAO
- IATA
- ACARE
Development tendencies in relation to the UN resolution A/RES/66/288 | |||||||||||||
Goals Indicators | PI: Productivity |
PI: Specific fuel consumption |
SDI: CO2 Emissions |
SDI: Accidents |
SDI: Mobility |
||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
Development tendencies in relation to the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (Vision 2050) | |||||||||||||
Goals Indicators | PI: Productivity |
PI: Specific fuel consumption |
SDI: CO2 Emissions |
SDI: Accidents |
SDI: Mobility |
||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
Development tendencies in relation to ICAO's strategic objectives 2011-2013 | |||||||||||||
Goals Indicators | PI: Productivity |
PI: Specific fuel consumption |
SDI: CO2 Emissions |
SDI: Accidents |
SDI: Mobility |
||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
Development tendencies in relation to IATA's priorities and targets | |||||||||||||
Goals Indicators | PI: Productivity |
PI: Specific fuel consumption |
SDI: CO2 Emissions |
SDI: Accidents |
SDI: Mobility |
||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
Development tendencies in relation to the ACARE Flightpath 2050 objectives | |||||||||||||
Goals Indicators | PI: Productivity |
PI: Specific fuel consumption |
SDI: CO2 Emissions |
SDI: Accidents |
SDI: Mobility |
||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|